Take for example... The Bell Jar, one of my favorites. While one is certainly able to just pick up The Bell Jar at random and begin reading it, it wouldn't be possible to fully understand the meaning of it without at least considering the historical context of the novel. Why would Esther be so hesitant to get married? Why is she so eager to rebel, to release her sexual tension? If the reader didn't know anything about life for women in the 1950s-60s, that women who were often the ideal housewives were unhappy and trapped, how would they fully comprehend Esther's need to break through the social constructs that (help to) encase her in the bell jar? Also, Sylvia Plath's life itself is an important contextual factor. The Bell Jar is autobiographical, and full appreciation/comprehension of the novel is definitely dependent upon Sylvia's struggle with her inner demons and depression.
Oh, Animal Farm... what on earth is that about? Without knowing something about George Orwell or the time in which he lived, Animal Farm would seem totally ridiculous. Talking pigs? Animals overtaking a farm? The pigs becoming the leaders of the entire farm? What?
So, Roland Barthes... what were you thinking? Yeah, books standing alone may have their own meanings (and sometimes the wrong ones), but the meanings are so much stronger with all the background information.
Context... it's important.
No comments:
Post a Comment